Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer: ‘Second Wave’ is Faked
In a stunning development, a former Chief Science Officer for the
pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says “there is no science to suggest a
second wave should happen.” The “Big Pharma” insider asserts that false
positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used
to manufacture a “second wave” based on “new cases.”
Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, says that half or even “almost all” of tests for COVID are false positives.
Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much
lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many
countries already.
In an interview last week Dr. Yeadon was asked:
“we are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a
civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six people in a
meeting…all based on, what may well be, completely fake data on this
coronavirus?”
Dr. Yeadon answered with a simple “yes.”
Dr. Yeadon said in the interview that, given the “shape” of all important indicators in a worldwide pandemic, such as hospitalizations, ICU utilization, and deaths, “the pandemic is fundamentally over.”
Yeadon said in the interview:
“Were it not for the test data that you get from the TV
all the time, you would rightly conclude that the pandemic was over, as
nothing much has happened. Of course people go to the hospital, moving
into the autumn flu season…but there is no science to suggest a second
wave should happen.”
In a paper published this month, which was co-authored by Yeadon and two of his colleagues, “How Likely is a Second Wave?”, the scientists write:
“It has widely been observed that in all heavily infected
countries in Europe and several of the US states likewise, that the
shape of the daily deaths vs. time curves is similar to ours in the UK.
Many of these curves are not just similar, but almost super imposable.”
In the data for UK, Sweden, the US, and the world, it can be seen
that in all cases, deaths were on the rise in March through mid or late
April, then began tapering off in a smooth slope which flattened around
the end of June and continues to today. The case rates however, based on
testing, rise and swing upwards and downwards wildly.
Media messaging in the US is already ramping up expectations of a “second wave.”
Source
Source
Source
Source
Survival Rate of COVID Now Estimated to be 99.8%, Similar to Flu, Prior T-Cell Immunity
The survival rate of COVID-19 has been upgraded since May to 99.8% of infections. This comes close to ordinary flu, the survival rate of which is 99.9%. Although COVID can have serious after-effects, so can flu
or any respiratory illness. The present survival rate is far higher
than initial grim guesses in March and April, cited by Dr. Anthony
Fauci, of 94%, or 20 to 30 times deadlier. The Infection Fatality Rate
(IFR) value accepted by Yeadon et al in the paper is .26%. The survival rate of a disease is 100% minus the IFR.
Dr. Yeadon pointed out that the “novel” COVID-19 contagion is novel
only in the sense that it is a new type of coronavirus. But, he said,
there are presently four strains which circulate freely throughout the
population, most often linked to the common cold.
In the scientific paper, Yeadon et al write:
“There are at least four well characterised family
members (229E, NL63, OC43 and HKU1) which are endemic and cause some of
the common colds we experience, especially in winter. They all have
striking sequence similarity to the new coronavirus.”
The scientists argue that much of the population already has, if not
antibodies to COVID, some level of “T-cell” immunity from exposure to
other related coronaviruses, which have been circulating long before
COVID-19.
There is more. For the rest go
HERE This post has been updated They used the Freedom Of Information to try and find out if anyone has Isolated the Virus.
Seems no one has any records of that.